Daar us Sunnah
June 9, 2020
7 mins read
A detailed scholarly clarification demonstrating the sound Sunni creed of Imām al-Nawawī and al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, refuting their misattribution to Ashʿarī kalām theology through their own explicit statements and the transmitted consensus of the Salaf.
Shaykh ʿAbd al-Muḥsin ibn Ḥamad al-ʿAbbād al-Badr (b. 1353 AH / 1934 CE), may Allah preserve him, authored this article in order to clearly demonstrate the false and unfounded attribution of Imām Yaḥyā ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī (d. 676 AH / 1277 CE) and al-Ḥāfiẓ Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī (d. 852 AH / 1449 CE) to the theological schools of kalām rhetoric, specifically the Ashʿarī school and others akin to it.
The Shaykh discovered a work authored by Imām al-Nawawī entitled Juzʾ fīhi Dhikr Iʿtiqād al-Salaf fī al-Ḥurūf wa al-Aṣwāt, in which al-Nawawī explicitly states that he completed its composition on Thursday, the third of Rabīʿ al-Awwal, 676 AH, less than five months prior to his death. This is of particular importance, as it reflects the settled and final doctrinal position of the Imām. Shaykh ʿAbd al-Muḥsin al-ʿAbbād stated:
Then al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, concluded what he transmitted from Abū al-ʿAbbās al-Armawī, may Allah have mercy upon him, with an excellent chapter (pp. 80–82), in which he mentioned the creed of the Salaf regarding the Divine Attributes.
He wrote: “Chapter: Concerning the prophetic traditions which emphasise this creed and support it in affirming the perfection of the Attributes of Allah. This was the belief of the Imāms of Islām. May Allah gather us with them upon their belief, cause us to die while loving the righteous predecessors and the rightly guided Imāms, and may Allah be pleased with them all.”
Al-Nawawī then stated:
As for al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, may Allah have mercy upon him, evidence of the soundness of his creed is found in the conclusion of his monumental commentary Fatḥ al-Bārī fī Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Therein, he transmitted statements of the Salaf regarding the Divine Attributes which affirm them without takyīf (detailing their modality) or tashbīh (resemblance), while simultaneously affirming tanzīh (declaring Allah free of imperfection) without taʾwīl (figurative reinterpretation) or taʿṭīl (negation).
At the end of his commentary on the chapter concerning the statement of Allah, Exalted is He:
يَا أَيُّهَا الرَّسُولُ بَلِّغْ مَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْكَ مِن رَّبِّكَ
Ibn Ḥajar cited the words of Abū al-Muẓaffar ibn al-Samʿānī (d. 489 AH / 1096 CE). He stated that Ibn al-Samʿānī used these verses and ḥadīths to demonstrate the error of the speculative theologians who adopted kalām methodology by categorising existence into jism, jawhar, and ʿaraḍ.
They relied upon speculative reasoning and then subjected the revealed texts to it, accepting what conformed to their conjecture and rejecting what opposed it. Yet Allah commanded His Messenger ﷺ to convey the revelation in its entirety, particularly the matter of pure tawḥīd, which is the foundation of the religion. The Messenger ﷺ conveyed every fundamental and subsidiary matter without resorting to philosophical terminology. Neither he nor any of his Companions ever employed such language.
Thus, this path of speculative theology constitutes an innovation unknown to the Messenger ﷺ and his Companions, and it necessarily entails criticism of the Salaf and the attribution of ignorance and doubt to them. Ibn al-Samʿānī therefore warned sternly against engaging with or showing interest in such discourse.
Likewise, Ibn Ḥajar transmitted in Fatḥ al-Bārī (13:407–408) statements from a group of the Salaf affirming the Attributes without tashbīh, taḥrīf, or taʿṭīl. He concluded with his own decisive remarks, citing al-Bayhaqī, who narrated from Abū Dāwūd al-Ṭayālisī that Sufyān al-Thawrī (d. 161 AH / 778 CE), Shuʿbah ibn al-Ḥajjāj (d. 160 AH / 776 CE), Ḥammād ibn Zayd (d. 179 AH / 795 CE), Ḥammād ibn Salamah (d. 167 AH / 784 CE), Sharīk ibn ʿAbd Allah (d. 177 AH / 793 CE), and Abū ʿAwānah (d. 176 AH / 792 CE) all narrated the ḥadīths of the Attributes without delving into their modality or resembling them to creation.
Abū Dāwūd said: “This is our belief.” Al-Bayhaqī commented: “This is the creed of our senior scholars.”
Al-Lālikāʾī further transmitted with his chain of narration from Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan al-Shaybānī (d. 189 AH / 805 CE), who stated: “The jurists of Islām, from the East to the West, are unanimously agreed upon belief in the Qurʾān and in the prophetic traditions transmitted by trustworthy narrators regarding the Attributes of the Lord, without resembling them to creation or explaining their modality. Whoever explains their modality and adopts the belief of Jahm ibn Ṣafwān has departed from what the Messenger ﷺ and his Companions were upon and has separated from the main body of the Muslims, because he described the Lord with the attributes of a non-entity.”
al-ʿAbbād al-Badr, ʿAbd al-Muḥsin ibn Ḥamad.
A Clarification Exonerating al-Nawawī and Ibn Ḥajar from the Beliefs of the People of Kalām.
Riyadh: Dār al-Tawḥīd, n.d.
Citations from:
al-Nawawī, Juzʾ fīhi Dhikr Iʿtiqād al-Salaf fī al-Ḥurūf wa al-Aṣwāt.
Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, Fatḥ al-Bārī fī Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, vol. 13. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1379 AH.